|
The History of Treatments for Psoriasis
In 1775 Sir Percival Potts described coal tar as a human carcinogen,
having observed that chimney sweeps, boys who were small enough to slide
down chimneys to remove the soot, developed scrotal cancer. When he
provided an opportunity for these boys to bathe routinely, the incidence
of the malignant lesions decreased. This represented the first example in
the medical literature of an agent that was capable of causing cancer, but
was certainly not the last mention of coal tar, because for many decades
coal tar has been, and still is, the mainstay of topical therapy for
psoriasis. No one knew why or how it worked, but there are many medical
treatments that enjoyed wide use and clinical success long before anyone
knew how or why (aspirin, for example).
Another example of a treatment that developed without knowing why it
worked is ultraviolet therapy. Most psoriasis patients improve in the
summer when they are exposed to the sun, so the role of UV exposure became
obvious many years ago. Indeed, in 1925 Goeckerman introduced a protocol
for using gradually increased doses of ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation
together with the classic treatment – topical applications of coal tar.
This treatment regimen has had many modifications over the years, but
still remains the mainstay of therapy for patients with extensive, severe
psoriasis. An average of 20 to 30 treatments are required for successful
clearing (complete resolution of 90% of plaques), and this is followed by
maintenance therapy consisting of a decreasing number of lower dose of UVB
radiation once a week, unless relapse occurs, in which case the treatment
schedule must be increased. Aside from the staining and unpleasantness of
coal tar ointments, and the discomfort (sunburn) associated with the UVB
(plus the inconvenience of many visits to the dermatologist), this regimen
marks the successful use of two known carcinogens – coal tar and UVB, the
main agent in sunlight that is now known to be responsible for skin cancer
in humans.
As if that were not enough, along came the use of UVA radiation therapy
with Psoralen, a photosensitizing drug. UVA is the longer wave length of
sunlight that has a stronger role in skin wrinkling than in causing skin
cancer, but it also thought to play a major role in skin cancer duet to
the increase that followed the introduction of sun screen in 1935, since
it enabled persons to stay in the sun longer without the burning caused by
UVB. In the U.S., Psoralen is usually taken orally, although in Europe
topical forms tend to be more frequent. Psoralen from plant sources were
first reported as being effective for psoriasis in the early 1970s, with
the first use of Psoralen with UVA (PUVA) for the treatment of psoriasis
in 1974. As with the coal tars and UVB radiation, the mechanism of PUVA
was not understood at the time; indeed, many medical breakthroughs before
the recent emergence of modern insights from biotechnology research were
based on empirical observation – i.e. it worked. In any case, PUVA is
effective and widely used in patients with severe psoriasis or those who
no longer respond to coal tar and UVA, although PUVA has been associated
with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer.
The next class of drugs for therapy of psoriasis, antimetabolites, began
with the use of Aminopterin for treatment of childhood leukemia in the
late 1940s. Methotrexate is metabolized from Aminopterin, and when used on
patients with arthritis was shown to result in the clearing of psoriatic
plaques. Methotrexate is now approved by the FDA for use in severe
psoriasis as well as rheumatoid arthritis and certain cancers.
Although the exact mechanism of action of Methotrexate in psoriasis is
unknown, it was the first effective systemic medication used in the
treatment of psoriasis, and continues to be the standard of therapy
against which other therapies are compared. It is used in patients with
extensive psoriasis that does not respond to topical therapy, and a
“reasonable” goal is to achieve 75% clearing of the involved area.
This goal is accomplished in 60% to 75% of patients (in 3 months), using a
range of doses of Methotrexate. When the cumulative dose of Methotrexate
reaches 1500 mg, all patients should have liver biopsies with
subsequent biopsies at intervals thereafter, since psoriasis patients have
a 2.5 to 5 fold increased risk of developing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis
from treatment with Methotrexate than patients with rheumatoid arthritis
treated with similar doses. Although there are many side effects such as
nausea or diarrhea, severe hematological effects can occur in 25% of the
patients; even those taking low weekly doses can develop severe and
sometimes life-threatening decrease in their blood cell counts.
Other systemic cytotoxic drugs have also been used for treatment of severe
psoriasis, such as Azathioprine, which is a drug used to prevent rejection
of organ transplants. However, its use for psoriasis has been limited due
to the fact that is causes severe depression of blood formation by the
bone marrow and is also associated with an increased risk of malignancies
such as lymphoma or squamous cell carcinoma. A metabolite of Azathioprine,
Thioguanine, has been shown to cause cell death of activated T
lymphocytes, with the depletion of these lymphocytes from psoriatic
plaques resulting in clearing of the lesions. Thioguanine appears to be
successful in patients who could not continue Methotrexate therapy due to
liver damage, and an effective response rate of 48.8% was reported in one
study of 80 patients. However, bone marrow suppression occurs in 22-68% of
cases, depending on dosage schedules and cumulative doses.
In 1979 it was reported that Cyclosporine, another anti-rejection drug,
improved psoriasis. This was discovered serendipitously in patients
undergoing transplantation, with the first prospective study not reported
until 1986. Prior to this time, psoriasis research had been focused mostly
on trying to determine why the keratinocytes demonstrated such abnormal
growth and differentiation. Finding that Cyclosporine reduced the number
of T lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions, thereby leading to a significant
remission, led researchers to recognize that psoriasis was an immunologic
disorder. Cyclosporine is approved by the FDA for use in psoriasis, and it
is indicated in patients who have failed to respond to at least one
systemic therapy, or who cannot tolerate other systemic therapies. With
this treatment, about 65% of the patients achieve clearance or near
clearance, although not without side effects such as hypertension, which
is not dose dependent, and renal dysfunction, which is. Despite these 2
serious complications, Cyclosporine has proved effective with long term
administration using low concentration maintenance doses, although most
patients relapse and require higher doses over time. Relapse after
discontinuation of Cyclosporine is usually seen within 8 to 12 weeks. The
incidence of cancer in patients taking Cyclosporine is similar to that of
Methotrexate, with about 1% of patients developing malignancies of which
50% are skin cancers. Oral Tacrimilus, another anti-rejection drug, has
also been used for the treatment of psoriasis but it has side effects
similar to Cyclosporine. Topical Tacrimulus ointment has been tried but
although there were no symptomatic side effects, is it not significantly
effective.
Another category of oral therapies for psoriasis include those derived
from vitamin A. Etretinate was used in the U.S., and proved most effective
for postular psoriasis. However, Etretinate has teratogenic (birth defect
causing) potential, so its use is not indicated for women of childbearing
age, especially since after long term administration it can be stored in
fatty tissue, leading to detectable serum levels for more than two years
after discontinuation. Acitretin, a metabolite of Etretinate, is less
lipophilic and is cleared from the body more rapidly than Etretinate, so
is considered to pose less of a risk of birth defects. In the U.S.,
Acitretin has been approved by the FDA for treatment of psoriasis although
it is less effective than etretinate, which it has replaced. Systemic
retinoids can enhance the effects of many other topical and systemic
anti-psoriasis therapies, and are often used in association with topical
agents and phototherapy, but are not without significant side effects with
long-term therapy, which require periodic monitoring for skeletal
toxicity.
A topical retinoid, Tazarotene, was recently introduced for the treatment
of psoriasis, but it can irritate normal skin, causing pruritis and
erythema. With this topical therapy, in patients with a successful
response to therapy (defined as a 50% or greater clearing of psoriasis),
relapse occurred within three months of discontinuation in 37% of the
patients. The effect of Tazarotene may be enhanced when combined with UVB
or UVA radiation.
Another vitamin-derived therapy is Calciprotol, a topical vitamin D
analogue that came into use in 1992. However, it is mildly irritating and
hypercalcemia can results if the recommended dose is exceeded. When
Calciprotol is used after PUVA and UVB therapy, a lower does of radiation
may be needed.
Despite the extensive array of treatments used for psoriasis, topical
corticosteroids are the most widely used treatment in the U.S., because of
their short-term efficacy leading to better patient compliance. They have
been used since the introduction of hydrocortisone in 1952. However,
long-term therapy with topical steroids can cause thinning of the skin,
striae, skin discolorations, masking of local infections and
hypo-pigmentation.
There are many new drugs in development that target T-lymphocytes. In one
trial, 39% of patients treated weekly with the Genentech drug for 12 weeks
showed improvement of at least 75%, with side effects including headache,
chills and fever (side effects are said to diminish after the first dose).
Another genetically engineered drug from Biogen, Amevive, saw a similar
improvement after 12 weeks of weekly injections into muscle with side
effects ranging from headache to common-cold infections. However, although
discontinuation of therapy allows patients to remain in remission for an
average of 10 months, withdrawing the Genentech drug causes a rapid
relapse (half of the patients relapse in less than 64-70 days), while one
of the patients testing the Biogen therapy developed cancer. Many drugs in
this category are currently in development, but it remains to be seen if
their effects are long lasting and without undesirable side effects.
All of the treatments described above, and derivatives of the agents
mentioned, may treat psoriasis successfully but none are without
undesirable and sometimes severe side effects requiring monitoring and
balancing the use of one against the use of another therapy with respect
to which has the most tolerable side effect. The only agent not yet
mentioned is a class of more benign drugs used for psoriasis, the
keratolytics that assist in removing the scales associated with psoriasis.
Salicylic acid is the most commonly used keratolytic agent, with
prescription strengths ranging from 3% to 10% and it is essentially
without side effects when used appropriately.
Because of the efficacy plus relative safety of salicylic acid, a low
concentration (1.8%), which is recognized as effective by the FDA has been
used in the Miraderm cream, in which it is formulated in a base which aids
the keratolytic effect of salicylic acid by formulating it in a soothing
base with bioflavenoids (plant derived) anti-inflammatory agents and
emollients to counteract skin dryness.
Compared to all other treatments, Miraderm may appear to be too benign to
be effective, but it can be used to give your body a rest from steroids or
systemic therapy. When used in new patients, its results are rapid (well
below the 3 usual months required for efficacy of the other treatments)
and long lasting, and if there is a recurrence of plaques, these respond
even more rapidly to Miraderm than do the original lesions.
If you have had many different treatments for psoriasis, we recommend that
you give the big guns a rest and yourself a treat. What have you got to
lose?
|